October 23, 2019, 06:28:41 AM
 
*
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
 
 
 
Total time logged in: 0 minutes.
 
   Home   Help Login Register  

     
 

A D V E R T I S E M E N T

Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: 9-23-16  (Read 673 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
fshman
Registered User

Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 53
Location: ny




Ignore
« on: September 22, 2016, 06:19:56 PM »

Found an article about the polluted waters in the sink and rt 35 bridge. real eye opener!!!!

http://www.app.com/story/news/local/animals/2016/09/21/navesink-river-dogs-fecal-pollution/90685962/
Logged
chickenback
Registered User

Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 69
Location: nj




Ignore
« Reply #1 on: September 22, 2016, 07:29:42 PM »

Found an article about the polluted waters in the sink and rt 35 bridge. real eye opener!!!!

http://www.app.com/story/news/local/animals/2016/09/21/navesink-river-dogs-fecal-pollution/90685962/
 

I dont believe a word of it.  The water is clean and they admit they found no smoking gun.  All they said is that one sample came back over limits for swimming.  It could have been measurement error on their part or poor sampling technique. 
Logged

A D V E R T I S E M E N T


Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

 
 
Home
 
Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
Simple Audio Video Embedder


Google visited last this page July 01, 2019, 05:06:38 AM